Thinking differently about strategy: comparing paradigms
نویسنده
چکیده
Our paper shows that mainstream strategic thinking and research already challenges the established Newtonian-Cartesian paradigm. Newtonian thought is the customary mode of western thinking, but is that about to change? Some papers from a complexity standpoint have appeared in the mainstream journals but its precise implications and merits have yet to be systematically spelled out and debated. We aim to facilitate this debate by comparing the established Newtonian and emergent complexity paradigms, clarifying the implications of this new perspective for strategy research. We suggest that the complexity paradigm is better attuned to current strategic realities than its Newtonian-Cartesian counterpart.
منابع مشابه
Critical Thinking Ability and Vocabulary Learning Strategy Use: The Case of EFL Learners in an ESL Context
Critical thinking is considered important in the field of education due to its possible effects on language learning. Therefore, the reasons behind the success and failure of language learners have provoked researchers to examine different aspects of the language learning process. Moreover, improving learners’ critical thinking ability in the course of learning will enable students to rely on t...
متن کاملComparing the effectiveness of strengthening working memory and critical thinking training on emotion regulation strategies of children with special learning disorder
Abstract Objective: To compare the effectiveness of memory work and critical thinking training of children's movement regulation with special methods. Method: The current research was a semi-experimental research with a pre-test, post-test and control group design. The statistical population included all students aged 9 to 12 who referred to the center for special problems in Tabriz distri...
متن کاملThinking Differently about Sustainability: Experiences from the Uk Open University Thinking Differently about Sustainability: Experiences from the Uk Open University
Systems thinking is often invoked as a panacea for dealing with issues of sustainable development. Imperatives towards being more holistic—getting the bigger picture—are often coupled with a need for greater interdisciplinarity— joined-up-thinking—particularly amongst triple bottom line disciplines of economics, social studies and natural sciences. So why are systems thinking courses not more p...
متن کاملEnvironmental duress and epistasis: how does stress affect the strength of selection on new mutations?
To an evolutionary geneticist, the most important property of a new mutation is its effect on fitness. Stress is a reduction in fitness that can also alter the selection on new mutations. Although the effects of environmental and genetic stresses are typically studied separately, it is useful to consider them from the same perspective. Here we evaluate the common perception that stress increase...
متن کاملTowards a Critical Systems Approach to Policy Formulation in Organizations
This paper develops a critical systems approach to organizational policy formulation and in so doing, contributes to the literature on critical systems thinking (CST). For, whilst there is, in the literature on systems theory and practice, much written on the subject of strategy in organizations, there is very little on organizational policy and nothing from within the critical systems paradigm...
متن کامل